<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>digitaltodd - Latest Comments</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#forumcomments-35954455" type="application/json"/><link>http://todd.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 09:42:41 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The best Wordpress mobile Phone plugin!</title><link>http://digitaltodd.com/2008/08/11/the-best-wordpress-mobile-phone-plugin/#comment-13976173</link><description>Hi Todd,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nice post. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just to let you know, I've written a mobile plugin for wordpress that you should check out!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It retains the styling from web to mobile, so you get a consistent user experience across all platforms. Whilst the mobile plugin you're using works ok, it doesn't really look like your blog..  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It also keeps the same URL for mobile and web and makes sure every device in the world works - even new handsets that haven't been released work!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you fancy taking a look at mine, here's the home page for it: &lt;a href="http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/wapple-architect/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/wapple-arch...&lt;/a&gt; - there's plenty of screenshots to see what it can do.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It'd be great to hear your feedback on it if you fancy giving it a go.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rich Gubby</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 09:42:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Favorite Places</title><link>http://digitaltodd.com/2009/06/27/favorite-places/#comment-11903594</link><description>No my man, it isn't.  That's a beautiful shot my friend!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">homsy74</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:21:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Favorite Places</title><link>http://digitaltodd.com/2009/06/27/favorite-places/#comment-11880034</link><description>i am speechless. i wish i could jump into that photo.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">zoeDisco</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 08:17:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Favorite Places</title><link>http://digitaltodd.com/2009/06/27/favorite-places/#comment-11834956</link><description>yes i would say that you do :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">digitaltodd</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 14:29:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Favorite Places</title><link>http://digitaltodd.com/2009/06/27/favorite-places/#comment-11834879</link><description>It's been a while since I have seen anything like that. Damn I need to get out to my family cabin :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JCD</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 14:26:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cool Car Tech - Ford SYNC</title><link>http://digitaltodd.com/2008/11/19/cool-car-tech-ford-sync/#comment-6721626</link><description>Very cool. Thanks for sharing the news. In Japan too we have similar collaboration between Toyota and Microsoft to create futuristic cars.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mitzusedcar</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 06:24:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cool Car Tech - Ford SYNC</title><link>http://digitaltodd.com/2008/11/19/cool-car-tech-ford-sync/#comment-6678743</link><description>Short answer is no. Long answer is anything is possible but you would have to get a hold of the system from another vehicle. I highly doubt Ford will just sell you the SYNC system.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">digitaltodd</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 23:28:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cool Car Tech - Ford SYNC</title><link>http://digitaltodd.com/2008/11/19/cool-car-tech-ford-sync/#comment-6678400</link><description>Very great but can I install it on another car brands?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cuocthiseo</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 23:09:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cool Car Tech - Ford SYNC</title><link>http://digitaltodd.com/2008/11/19/cool-car-tech-ford-sync/#comment-6653320</link><description>Absolutely right, not to mention the other benefits of having hands free control over your phone and MP3 player no matter what the brand. I see that other manufacturers are starting to implement these systems, but no one is doing like Ford.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">digitaltodd</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 07:50:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cool Car Tech - Ford SYNC</title><link>http://digitaltodd.com/2008/11/19/cool-car-tech-ford-sync/#comment-6633672</link><description>This is cool. Hope this will fit every kind and car model. Things should be this advanced because technology is really needed and we must follow the trends.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">truck_body_parts</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:34:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cool Car Tech - Ford SYNC</title><link>http://digitaltodd.com/2008/11/19/cool-car-tech-ford-sync/#comment-6465248</link><description>You train SEO's.....yikes!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I know lots of people who use in car nav systems, myself included. If you had actually taken the time to read the article and watch the video you would also have seen that SYNC is not a navigation system, in fact the option for that was only introduced recently. SYNC is much more.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">digitaltodd</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 09:05:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cool Car Tech - Ford SYNC</title><link>http://digitaltodd.com/2008/11/19/cool-car-tech-ford-sync/#comment-6464106</link><description>Well, it is not a news that Microsoft Auto -  an embedded systems is extensively used in modern cars. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It would be however interesting to see how this new package would be received by car buyers. I know onel onely guy who uses navigation system just because he likes the sweet voice of the girl who directs him to his destination!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">seomumbai</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 05:52:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Amish Peanut Butter Spread - I Feel Duped</title><link>http://digitaltodd.com/2008/06/30/amish-peanut-butter-spread-i-feel-duped/#comment-6312688</link><description>I think you missed the entire point of the article,  it's not a complaint about the ingredients but in how the product is portrayed.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">digitaltodd</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:22:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Amish Peanut Butter Spread - I Feel Duped</title><link>http://digitaltodd.com/2008/06/30/amish-peanut-butter-spread-i-feel-duped/#comment-6312326</link><description>It doesnt say Old Fashioned recipe; does it?  No, it is in fact an old fashioned amish treat, probably around for a fairly long time.  Its not like you are really paying a huge premium for it either.  so, dont complain about so much, and just enjoy it if you like it.  If not, dont eat anymore of it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Yoda</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:00:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cool Car Tech - Ford SYNC</title><link>http://digitaltodd.com/2008/11/19/cool-car-tech-ford-sync/#comment-6259603</link><description>Well thank you for the compliment.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">digitaltodd</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 10:30:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cool Car Tech - Ford SYNC</title><link>http://digitaltodd.com/2008/11/19/cool-car-tech-ford-sync/#comment-6259516</link><description>I agree... I am hoping to see it in real life action very soon!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">digitaltodd</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 10:24:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Siu Kui &amp;#8220;Shaw&amp;#8221; Cheung - Painter</title><link>http://digitaltodd.com/2009/02/10/siu-kui-shaw-cheung-painter/#comment-6146582</link><description>Thank you very much. I guess it is obvious that I had a great time doing this and I really would like to do more in the future.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">digitaltodd</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:47:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Siu Kui &amp;#8220;Shaw&amp;#8221; Cheung - Painter</title><link>http://digitaltodd.com/2009/02/10/siu-kui-shaw-cheung-painter/#comment-6146384</link><description>What a great post! Inspirational. Great story, well written and great paintings. I especially like the eternity painting!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;More stuff like this, please! :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">6ft5</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:40:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cool Car Tech - Ford SYNC</title><link>http://digitaltodd.com/2008/11/19/cool-car-tech-ford-sync/#comment-5861348</link><description>The collaboration of Ford and Microsoft is much better compared to the Nokia and Renault's team up... The software (SYNC) has such features that I personally like the most and I think that such technology is a great addition to the car.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">chai29</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 04:43:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: HTC S640 Full review</title><link>http://digitaltodd.com/2008/05/16/htc-s640-full-review/#comment-5508024</link><description>Hi Chad, I probably should have been more clear. The sync for the device data is not really an issue, that works well enough. Cable or no cable adding multimedia to the microSD card is painfully slow. It is faster to take the card out of the phone than hooking up the cable. It can take fully 20 mins to copy 2GBs to the phone through Windows Media Player.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">todd</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 08:57:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: HTC S640 Full review</title><link>http://digitaltodd.com/2008/05/16/htc-s640-full-review/#comment-5508023</link><description>are you syncing with bluetooth? that could be why it takes so long to sync</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chad</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 21:32:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Plurk Is Better Than Twitter</title><link>http://digitaltodd.com/2008/06/26/why-plurk-is-better-than-twitter/#comment-5508035</link><description>hey todd&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;i agree that twitter needs to catch up. esp. lately with everything breaking down! twitter can become an echo chamber if you aren't careful.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;i haven't tried out plurk but i will now!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;z</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">zoe</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 12:23:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Plurk Is Better Than Twitter</title><link>http://digitaltodd.com/2008/06/26/why-plurk-is-better-than-twitter/#comment-5508033</link><description>Well Peggie, I would have to say that the plurk time line takes a little getting used too but once oyu get the flow I find it is easy to move back and forth to follow the conversations. As far as getting responses to plurks that can be a bit harder, I found that it took a while to get recognized as well but once it started I had a hard time keeping up. I respond a lot more than I plurk.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;P.S. my plurk link is up in the Cyberstalking Tools section, friend me and I'll say good morning :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;tj, yeah the community is growing and it seems that the early adopters are very welcoming... see you on the line!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">todd</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:57:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Plurk Is Better Than Twitter</title><link>http://digitaltodd.com/2008/06/26/why-plurk-is-better-than-twitter/#comment-5508034</link><description>I'm with you ... in the short amount of time on Plurk, I've interacted with more people than the MONTHS I've spent on twitter.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;plurk user: teejayhanton</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tj</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 12:14:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Plurk Is Better Than Twitter</title><link>http://digitaltodd.com/2008/06/26/why-plurk-is-better-than-twitter/#comment-5508031</link><description>I think I'm definitely missing something.  Maybe I need a user manual or I'm just a different kind of thinker/learner.  I can't seem to get any responses on plurk (although, admittedly maybe the way I say good morning isn't as fun as the way someone else says it?)  and I get all confused on the time line.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I know I'my laying myself out on the line here, but I'm trying to figure out what I'm doing wrong.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm enjoying twhirl and get a decent amount of responses that way -- and i like the format -- it's easier for me to follow than the plurk timeline.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Please, I want to like plurk, I must be doing it wrong.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Peggie</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Peggie</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 09:58:20 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>